Last Tuesday, I went and saw Taken, a movie directed by Pierre Morel and starring Liam Neeson. In America, Taken opened about a month ago and it has since become the first surprise hit of 2009. Audiences are not only flocking to the movie but are apparently even returning for a second look. I went to the movie intending to discover why.
And what did I discover?
Taken works.
How to describe Taken? In a word, cathartic. It's difficult to think of the last time a movie generated so much audience goodwill by graphically detailing a series of homicides.
It helps, of course, that the people being killed are a bunch of dirty-looking Albanian white slavers and that the man doing the killing is Liam Neeson. In the movie, Neeson plays a retired CIA agent who simply wants to bond with his teenage daughter (played a surprisingly sweet Maggie Grace). His efforts are foiled by 1) his own paranoid nature, 2) his ex-wife's lingering bitterness, and 3) the fact that his daughter, a U2 groupie, goes to Paris in an effort to follow the band and ends up getting kidnapped by the previously mentioned Albanians.
Now, if this movie had been made by an American studio, one imagines that -- at this point -- Neeson would somehow get it into his head that Bono, The Edge, Larry, and Adam are responsible for his daughter's disappearance. After an initial confrontation, Neeson and the band would form an uneasy alliance to rescue his daughter. One imagines that they would also be helped by a comedic roadie who just happened to be Albanian -- just to make sure that nobody walked away from the film convinced that all dirty, sweaty Albanians make a living out of kidnapping innocent white virgins. Neeson and the band would bond and the movie would probably end with Neeson replacing whichever member of the band ended up getting killed during the rescue operation (it would probably be Adam, don't you think?)
However, this isn't a Hollywood film. It's a low budget, French film and it was written and produced by Luc Besson, who has never met a B-movie archetype that he didn't love. As such, Neeson goes to Paris searching for his daughter and spends about 75 minutes of screen time, more or less, killing people.
You might guess from what I've just written that I didn't care much for Taken. You would be wrong. As a movie, Taken works. Yes, the movie's violence occasionally threatens to cross the line into pure sadism, And yes, it is a bit bizarre how easily Neeson manages to track down the guilty Albanians once he reaches Paris. And yes, the film does end with a coda that seems to suggest that the filmmakers are ignorant of the concept of post-traumatic stress disorder.
But none of that matters because, in the end, Taken works.
The main reason why the movie works is because of Liam Neeson's work in the lead role. Once you accept the idea of a retired CIA agent with a heavy Irish accent, Neeson is never less than convincing as both a devoted, if hardly perfect, father and a ruthless murderer. Once you accept the sincerity of both the character's love for his daughter and his regret for missing so much of her childhood, it becomes much more easier to accept the idea of this same character shooting an innocent bystander in the arm in order to get some information about his daughter's whereabouts. Neeson brings so much needed gravity to both the role and the film.
The various men that Neeson kills are all convincingly sleazy and Maggie Grace is rather sweet in the role of Neeson's daughter. While the daughter, ultimately, remains more of a symbol of purity than an actual human being, Grace is likable enough in the role that one doesn't mind seeing her potential defilers brutally killed. That's where the catharsis comes in. In these times when the President of the United States is blithely assuring us that, as long as we're civil to them, we don't have to worry about terrorists trying to blow us up and when the American government is starting to resemble one of those high-minded but ultimately rather ineffectual parliaments that have come to typify Europe, there is something amazingly cathartic about seeing Liam Neeson gun a sleazy flesh peddler down without a sign of hesitation or a hint of guilt.
In the future, Taken may be remembered as the first film to truly benefit from America's growing torture nostalgia.
It may seem strange, to many American audiences, to realize that Taken is actually a French film. Typically, brutal, non-martial arts-related action films are seen as being a solely American affair. However, when viewing the actual movie, it becomes obvious that the story itself could have sprung only from the French subconscious.
One need only consider that the film's villians are a group of immigrants who are thriving in Paris largely because the legal authorities -- as a result of financial corruption and personal weakness -- are impotent to stop them. Instead, the only solution to the problem is for an American to come over to France and -- without the help of any actual French citizens -- brutally murder all of them. Naturally, the American doesn't do this to help the French. Instead, he does it because he feels that his "property" has been violated. However, regardless of his reasons, the American still ends up doing what the French themselves want to do but what they ultimately -- because they are French and, as such, represent a higher ideal -- can not do. And then, of course, the American promptly gets on a plane and goes away so that the French don't have to be reminded of his existence.
But, in the end, all of that is purely academic. Beyond a handful of movie goers, that sort of thing really doesn't matter to anyone sitting in the audience.
To them, only one things matters.
Taken works.